Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:45:24 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Marc Wiz <marc@wiz.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Necessary code or trash? Message-ID: <20030828214523.GF29750@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20030828213640.GI6312@freshaire.wiz.com> References: <1671561231.20280829005225@mail.ru> <20030828213345.GD80772@christabel.starbreaker.net> <20030828213640.GI6312@freshaire.wiz.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 28), Marc Wiz said: > Sticking with /bin/sh is a good idea. > > What I have done is build a static version of bash and put it /bin > > I changed root's shell to /bin/bash and run just fine. > > Has anyone noticed what a pain it is to build bash statically and > install it in /bin? I don't use bash, but the bash2 port Makefile looks like it builds a static binary by default: CONFIGURE_ENV= LDFLAGS=-static -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030828214523.GF29750>