From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr  1 19:36:35 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA21315 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 19:36:35 -0800
Received: from ns1.win.net (ns1.win.net [204.215.209.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA21308 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 19:36:29 -0800
Received: (from bugs@localhost) by ns1.win.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA01108 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 22:38:13 -0500
From: Mark Hittinger <bugs@ns1.win.net>
Message-Id: <199504020338.WAA01108@ns1.win.net>
Subject: why not 2+ freebsd partitions per disk?
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 22:38:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 212       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Just a quick question - is there a technical reason why two or more freebsd
partitions per disk cannot be done?  Or is it just some code that hasn't
been written yet?  :-)

Regards,

Mark Hittinger
bugs@win.net