Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:21:52 +0900 (JST) From: shudo@computer.org To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 8 Message-ID: <20030213.232152.213978646.shudo@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030213051815.A45463@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20030213051815.A45463@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> > Patchset 8 for JDK 1.3.1 is up on the web site. Thanks Greg and contributers! I tested OpenJIT 1.1.16 (*), TYA 1.8 and shuJIT 0.7.14 with the version of JDK and all of them works well. There remains a bug that I believe it's due to JDK and I reported in the below post. But the workaround for the problem is automatically turned on for FreeBSD JDK 1.3.X, then users will not see any problem. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=151180+0+archive/2002/freebsd-java/20020317.freebsd-java Subject: shuJIT 0.7.11 From: shudo@computer.org Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:38:55 +0900 I reconfirmed the problem with jEdit 3.2.2, shuJIT 0.7.14 without the workaround and JDK 1.3.1p8 on FreeBSD 4.7 Today's STABLE. (*) Incidentally, OpenJIT 1.1.16 seems to have a bug, which was once reported and the fix to the bug has not been available publicly. The following post reported the bug. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=207907+0+archive/2001/freebsd-java/20011125.freebsd-java Subject: GC is not work in jdk1.3.1p5+OpenJIT1.1.16 From: huang wen hui <huanghwh@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:10:21 -0800 (PST) And, the fix is as follows: ========== --- ./rt-X86.c.orig Tue Dec 4 10:07:56 2001 +++ ./rt-X86.c Tue Dec 4 10:08:18 2001 @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ ASM("leave; jmp OpenJIT_invokeinterface_quick"); } -static JHandle * +static JHandle * ATTRIBUTE((stdcall)) OpenJIT_newarray(int type, int size) { JHandle *ret; ========== > FWIW this release should be JCK compliant(*) thanks to assistance from > WorldGate Communications, Inc., particularly Philippe Laporte, Michael Sinz > and Bruce Bauman (please see the THANKS file for details). > > I'm sure you can all guess what that means to the project! At last. I'm also interested in JCK results with JIT compilers. We will not be allowed to know how tests failed, but it may be OK to know how many tests are there and how many of them could not be passed. Of course, a trial of JCK will be time-consuming work wasting Greg's time and this is just from my curiosity. Thanks, Kazuyuki Shudo shudo@computer.org http://www.shudo.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030213.232152.213978646.shudo>