From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 15 23:14:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A141065693 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CD48FC16 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so35137wwd.31 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i7r6gDO6mlxpQ6hL8QuNiGJfs6tMGB9l4aKNkoPn/NQ=; b=wbeOjsYfREoW78ik2P1EZFBcfleDtf8Bszmqrb8p4OTpcrylXUM/yc/bN3137axfZQ ruyRptYNXwQmDKryMvIopgKZd4wEikEmLK3rynfRtu9E8Px+lm2USGysv4sAYyt+eD5C aeRy/6GsMcwzEjR0Vrwnch86taXLBp2WSdLfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=r+K+aH4FSESq0mtTi2gy0lZFEtFLNUzh6FkjrexD8r7LsmZyY/eT4dPd12RfnygHwv ZaG1xdB2Fhpe+l2oje0d/u3aKZfVQRqgHfkhCgRiU8Ss58eJz9yhW3a1bGWHKntBHiVQ sIBsK97y9EKSmG0OW+E01urKSHdEwJ93JHLQU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.152.21 with SMTP id e21mr6720553wbw.188.1289862861786; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.2.206 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:14:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CE1B673.6010306@greatbaysoftware.com> References: <4CDDBAC6.6080500@greatbaysoftware.com> <4CE1913D.7010207@greatbaysoftware.com> <4CE1A9F1.8050400@greatbaysoftware.com> <4CE1B673.6010306@greatbaysoftware.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:14:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Charles Owens Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4): 4-port Intel Pro/1000 PF card not detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:14:24 -0000 The way you talked about this at first made me think this was something new= , but its actually fairly old, its just a quad port 82571, id is 0x10A5, support has been in the drivers for ages :) The issue is the hardware not the OS or driver, even if the motherboard is PCIE 2.0, does it not have slots that are 1 ? For server adapters you might consider going 82576 or 82580. Jack On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Charles Owens wrote: > Well, I believe we have an answer: > > http://www.intel.com/support/network/adapter/pro100/sb/CS-030873.htm > > The motherboard definitely is PCIe 2.0 . The page suggests these cards > for use with a PCIe2.0 system: > > Intel=AE PRO/1000 PT Quad Port LP Server Adapter (P/N EXPI9404PTL) > Intel=AE Gigabit ET Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET) > Intel=AE Gigabit ET2 Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET2) > > Notably there's not a PF option shown, so we're going to have to think > about that. But in any case, do you think these models will function wi= th > 8.0? 8.0 plus a patch? .... or is 8.1 the only option? > > Thanks, > Charles > > > On 11/15/10 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > Well, if the system doesnt show the hardware in a PCI scan there isn't mu= ch > my driver can do :) > > The last line in your log says 'eth0', what's that about? > > You could try booting 8.1 64 bit, you can also send me all the details > about the board, just to > make sure I can get the exact one and then I'll try it here. This is quad > port fiber, right? I was > thinking this was PCI ID 0x1527, 82580 adapter. The support is in HEAD > now. > > Regards, > > Jack > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Charles Owens < > cowens@greatbaysoftware.com> wrote: > >> Jack, I'm afraid that with the card _not_ installed we get identical >> pciconf output. We're running 32 bit simply because that's where we got >> rolling with our product, and have not yet made the call to invest in th= e >> effort required to make the jump to 64. Do you think that our being at = 32 >> bit could be a factor here? >> >> So far the same card model has been tested on several of these server >> appliances, so I doubt it's a bad-slot situation. >> >> In case it's helpful, I've attached a boot log. Anything else that I c= an >> provide that might help? >> >> Thank you, >> Charles >> >> >> >> On 11/15/10 3:23 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: >> >>> UH, did you do that with the adapter in the system?? I do not see the I= D >>> I >>> expected >>> to see. Some reason you're running 32 bit?? >>> >>> Can you run the pciconf with the adapter in and out, compare and tell m= e >>> what its >>> ID is? All the unidentified devices I see are in the 0x3XXX range and >>> those >>> are not >>> network devices. >>> >>> Maybe its a bad slot? >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Charles Owens< >>> cowens@greatbaysoftware.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> Great... thanks! Please see attached. BTW, the system is running >>>> 8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 (PAE). >>>> >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/13/10 2:24 AM, Jack Vogel wrote: >>>> >>>> pciconf -l please, I'll betcha these are the new quad ports that are i= n >>>> my >>>> next igb driver >>>> update, it would have gone in already but I've been fighting a bug in >>>> the >>>> header split >>>> code. >>>> >>>> Show me what the output looks like, and I'll get ya fixed up, dont wor= ry >>>> :) >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Charles Owens< >>>> cowens@greatbaysoftware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> We're trying to work with newly purcharsed Intel EXPi9404PF NICs >>>>> ("Intel >>>>> PRO/1000 PF Quad Port Server Adapter") but they do not seem to be >>>>> detected >>>>> (no ports showing with 'ifconfig -l'). We're having no problems wit= h >>>>> the >>>>> 2-port version of the same card -- is there a known issue with the >>>>> 4-port >>>>> version? >>>>> >>>>> We've tried three different cards of this model, all with same result= . >>>>> Thanks in advance for any help. >>>>> >>>>> Charles >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Owens >>>>> Great Bay Software, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >