From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 05:47:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2720116A417 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E810E13C468 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EFFB4715C for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01218-06 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27A3B46CB7 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998DE5FA53 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:48 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:27 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6C9CF4C3635197B3CBED0D78@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: IPv6 <-> NAT <-> IPv4 ... possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:47:49 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even possible ... the IPv6 IPs would be private (equiv to 192.168.x.x) ... basically, none of the hosts behind NAT need a public IP, *but* I may end up with more then 256 hosts, so was wondering if using IPv6 behind the NAT would be 'simplier' ... If possible, pointers to docs to read would be appreciated ... Thanks ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHGETv4QvfyHIvDvMRApvkAKCiOKnBaN1dvhAX6f5SxXUBk9DreQCdEqh0 QbNARJ2zQhsnlOn33OfNe38= =zWda -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----