From owner-freebsd-commit  Wed Aug  2 09:40:48 1995
Return-Path: commit-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA16886
          for commit-outgoing; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 09:40:48 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA16870
          for cvs-libexec-outgoing; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 09:40:36 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA16864
          ; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 09:40:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA12574; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 09:39:21 -0700
Message-Id: <199508021639.JAA12574@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: paul@freebsd.org, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com,
        cvs-libexec@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/getty gettytab.5 main.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Aug 1995 04:39:02 PDT."
             <3050.807363542@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 1995 09:39:21 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: commit-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Actually, what we are arguing about is a philosophy.

Taken to an extreme, you can follow the sun philosophy and ship a
unix system out of the box with "+" in /etc/host.equiv or you can
take the approach that we should ship a system that is reasonably
secure for someone to install out of the box on the net.

Do you really want to have to answer the hate mail when Joe Linux-twit
installs FreeBSD for the first time and gets raped because he didn't know
he needed to set a password on 'toor' ?

Which do you want, Jordan?