From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 04:41:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CF637B401 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ECA43F85 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53Bf2MD010007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:41:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id h53Beu747282; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:40:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16092.35144.948752.554975@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:40:56 -0400 (EDT) To: Martin Blapp In-Reply-To: <20030603113927.I71313@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20030603113927.I71313@cvs.imp.ch> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:41:06 -0000 Martin Blapp writes: > > Hi, > > >I don't want to sound harsh, and I do appreciate your work. However, > >I think the last thing FreeBSD needs now is to get slower. We're > >already far slower than that other free OS. Shouldn't we consider > >making the dynamic root optional and leaving a static root as > >standard? > > This is during startup. Webservers and all other applications are > still dynamically linked as before. No speed loss there. > Webservers and all other applications which run shell scripts exec a shell to interpret that script. Regardless of how the parent is linked, if the exec'ed shell is dynamically linked, there is an added cost to exec'ing it. Drew