Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 01:37:44 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is anybody using ng_pipe? Message-ID: <5410b88c-4b6c-c2ef-fa8d-4105bd923627@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNxgoSNX2%2BLd=eEXRH0q7-XFzSF=b2GPzZgNW1LDCvq5Xw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFMmRNxgoSNX2%2BLd=eEXRH0q7-XFzSF=b2GPzZgNW1LDCvq5Xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.08.2020 0:17, Ryan Stone wrote: > I'd like to dump all of this and just implement a packet loss rate, > which would simplify all this immensely. Is anybody using ng_pipe > with a non-zero BER who would object to this? Given this litany of > issues I doubt it, but I thought that I'd be sure. Take a look at dummynet(4): kldload dummynet # adds (optional) queueing delay plus 10 ms additional delay ipfw pipe 1 config bw 100Mbit/s delay 10 # add packet drop probability ipfw add 3000 prob 0.05 deny ip from any to any in # apply bandwidth limit/delay ipfw add 3010 pipe 1 ip from any to any in
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5410b88c-4b6c-c2ef-fa8d-4105bd923627>