Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:30:54 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, knu@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: portupgrade weirdness? Message-ID: <20020111093054.E7984@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <3C3EEEF4.3050007@owt.com>; from kstewart@owt.com on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:56:04AM -0800 References: <20020111042746.D7984@elvis.mu.org> <3C3EEEF4.3050007@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> [020111 05:56] wrote: > > > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Checking the origin of ghostscript-6.01_1 > > Stale origin: 'print/ghostscript' > > Guessing... no idea. > > New origin? (? to help): print/ghostscript6 > > ghostscript6 ghostscript6-nox11 > > New origin? (? to help): print/ghostscript6 > > ghostscript6 ghostscript6-nox11 > > New origin? (? to help): print/ghostscript6 > > print/ghostscript6: Not found. Force it? [no] > > > > uhhh... HELP! :) > > > The one you want is > > Port: ghostscript-gnu-6.52 > Path: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu > Info: GNU Postscript interpreter > Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org > Index: print > B-deps: XFree86-3.3.6_10 gettext-0.10.35 gmake-3.79.1 jpeg-6b_1 png-1.2.1 > R-deps: XFree86-3.3.6_10 png-1.2.1 Yes, but I think it would be better if it was: print/ghostscript6: Not found. Force it? Install it? [fi] or something, sure I _want_ ghostscript-gnu-6.52, but portupgrade isn't telling me to install it, it's telling me to point at it. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020111093054.E7984>