From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun May 8 07:44:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47003B324AA; Sun, 8 May 2016 07:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF99137C; Sun, 8 May 2016 07:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j8so170715711lfd.2; Sun, 08 May 2016 00:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=pOdVZgTKddG54iGsREB+q14rxni84BPWuCTolmY5LFw=; b=zD2S54kDjL9WPlVfTq8ywJ+gfsLNt5E/q4YAGXpS1fV+ekgHuAO4NPJlvSA12l4jzI gq1YizpaTPiIi3PP0si09mZfPEa5PD+CFePpIw+Y0nd7EKiFLvVJujlftAmP2Vfz28dQ +lmEON8GgSBA7RmoO85Mgz+MqkRSI7s91oIK0eBZ3s321/H5fDHiugbodWJugLnaWV7f SPy8QKUI1dE/m0pIAnMyHsgflugmojQzeIszxIYCaH7HbECe3V4jBJo52AZIHMaKQkcl QKYA7ayV+/ME+jfmsQrYwXtXx16Mjs+JYBBYgwr2sF9wfqJebWOoY33R+t+qb8FnebY3 4XXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=pOdVZgTKddG54iGsREB+q14rxni84BPWuCTolmY5LFw=; b=EfSfGw4rbaLLE/wMoc5HD7mATpBCd2qhr1wnLj91o3uBVAUnT0DEz0UyCnrqaFAvh2 uWZ+NY+GxYqB4QxVFAeMILf7QXM0eldfsATwqgeNV+Vcz7cjlHuG5w0EtYPIJelMNOZA 8856PY7QFiWVqHb3Tq56z1qsiko+UR69sfm+JKyDEGx4N+Fp0nHNhOAUVZZHigGwBPc6 AuQI5NOrLMcD391eHy8Kcuut++OzPXvl85d9TCOLWImtnJOOGAyWNVtO8yucVDmfJSJi tcjrMzvRyBa+YOhmVDBlqTzOnt0IiKCYWS+4PdhsBpMOYZ4d37izUXhHU2YEN10P7Uj8 uSbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWskk57dcXYlZiT64KhY7m/yXSx8J0bgkU8mWa0D3JxqzzwG76zngIDozLTJuFkznFPwEAv3kKOVVTmAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.41.72 with SMTP id p69mr12792470lfp.7.1462693479112; Sun, 08 May 2016 00:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com Received: by 10.25.21.84 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2016 00:44:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201605071810.u47IAEGx095469@repo.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 09:44:39 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LIs2V-VxomWoKwfdDys492UBzKE Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r414781 - head/multimedia/ffmpeg From: Thomas Zander To: Jan Beich Cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 07:44:41 -0000 Hi Jan, On 7 May 2016 at 21:40, Jan Beich wrote: > Can you MFH all patch-level updates by default? Those contain stability > and security fixes much desired on quaterly branches. I'd be happy to do that, I was just not aware of this policy. For ffmpeg, I routinely double-check https://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html and noticed that 2.8.7 does not fix any known vulnerability. Since no build or runtime errors were reported in bugzilla for 2.8.6, it seemed to me that the quarterly branch does not have a problem that needs fixing. Is patch-level updating covered by a blanket? Best regards Riggs