From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:08:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB5A106566B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.net (centre.keltia.net [IPv6:2a01:240:fe5c::41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824048FC18 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr (aran.keltia.net [88.191.250.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix/TLS) with ESMTPSA id 6804D1380E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:45 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120213140844.GA61050@roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr> References: <20120202191105.GA55719@nargothrond.kdm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120202191105.GA55719@nargothrond.kdm.org> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / Macbook Pro - FreeBSD 7.2 / Dell D820 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver in stable/9 and stable/8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:08:56 -0000 According to Kenneth D. Merry: > The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS > HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is now in stable/9 and stable/8. Thanks. > Note that the CAM infrastructure changes that went into FreeBSD/head along > with this driver have not gone into either stable/9 or stable/8. Only the > driver itself has been merged. > > The CAM infrastructure changes depend on some other da(4) driver changes > that will need to get merged before they can go back. If that merge > happens, it will probably only be into stable/9. Got an ETA for this? Saying differently, is it reasonable to run stable/9 with the new driver but w/o the CAM changes? What do these changes bring BTW? Sorry, been out-of-touch these days :( Thanks. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/