From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  3 22:54:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D8616A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Jun 2004 22:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from noname.csdl.lt (noname.csdl.lt [194.176.40.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06C2443D48
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Jun 2004 22:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from paulius@devnull.lt)
Received: (qmail 8168 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Jun 2004 05:54:04 -0000
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:54:04 +0300
From: Paulius Bulotas <paulius@devnull.lt>
To: Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20040604055404.GA7612@devnull.lt>
References: <20040603203040.GA67747@devnull.lt>
	<20040603210622.6030216A4CF@hub.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040603210622.6030216A4CF@hub.freebsd.org>
X-URL: http://devnull.lt/
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ndis problems (T40, Centrino, upgraded 06.03)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 05:54:09 -0000

Hi,

On 04 06 03, Bill Paul wrote:
> > ndis0: set mclist failed: 6
> > ndis0: set filter failed: 6
> Did it always print the "set mclist failed" and "set filter failed"
> messages or is this new? (Helps if you tell me these things so I don't

I've always seen these messages, but since wireless worked, I had no
complaints at all.
I'm using the driver from IBM website, string from w70n51.INF:
DriverVer   = 02/10/2004,1.2.1.11

Paulius