From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 18 14:42:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0594516A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EF64D43D2D; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bmilekic@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (bmilekic@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i7IEgpxe024895;	Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bmilekic@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7IEgpZk024894;
	Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 +0000
From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@FreeBSD.org>
To: David Rhodus <sdrhodus@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040818144251.GA22971@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: chris@behanna.org
cc: drhodus@machdep.com
cc: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:52 -0000


David Rhodus wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> wrote:
>> I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness.
>> I'd rather call it open development.
>>
>> rik
>
>Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the
>development work going on.  Thats what started this thread in the
>first place.
>
>--
>                                            -David
>                                            Steven David Rhodus

  When are you and some of your DragonFly minions going to stop spreading
  this garbage?

  If you want to talk about open-source, why don't you divert the attention
  to the frankly cowardly behavior going on pertaining to parts of the
  DragonFly source tree instead?  Whereas DragonFly has appropriated a
  significant amount of FreeBSD code, only to ammend the lisencing to its
  own network code to include the advertising clause (removed officially
  from the BSDL a while ago now), and for what? Only to make it difficult for
  FreeBSD to take some of the code back.

  So if you want to talk about 'shitty open-source
  practises,' I'd argue that yours are much more significant than ours.

-Bosko