Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:52:10 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330696 - in head/libexec/tftpd: . tests Message-ID: <201803091552.w29FqAWo065077@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201803091530.w29FUKin041283@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Author: asomers > Date: Fri Mar 9 15:30:20 2018 > New Revision: 330696 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330696 > > Log: > Add some functional tests for tftpd(8) > > tftpd(8) is difficult to test in isolation due to its relationship with > inetd. Create a test program that mimics the behavior of tftp(1) and > inetd(8) and verifies tftpd's response in several different scenarios. At one time I thought it was possible to run all of the external "inetd" daemons as standalone daemons without inetd involved. I do not recall if tftpd was included in that, but believe it was. I am sure that telnetd and ftpd would run standalone. Have we lost some useful functionality here that maybe we want back? > These test cases cover all of the basic TFTP protocol, but not the optional > parts. > > PR: 157700 > PR: 225996 > PR: 226004 > PR: 226005 > MFC after: 3 weeks > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14310 ... -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201803091552.w29FqAWo065077>