From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 14 21:29:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23144 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:29:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from k6n1.znh.org (dialup11.gaffaneys.com [208.155.161.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23120; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:29:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zach@gaffaneys.com) Received: (from zach@localhost) by k6n1.znh.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA15384; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 04:29:49 GMT (envelope-from zach) Message-ID: <19980914232949.A11158@znh.org> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:29:49 -0500 From: Zach Heilig To: Satoshi Asami , Zach Heilig Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ELF style (where to test PORTOBJFORMAT) References: <19980914085939.A9766@znh.org> <199809142116.OAA24203@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199809142116.OAA24203@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 02:16:52PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 02:16:52PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Yes, this would be fine. It's generally not recommended to put things > after ".include ", but I think in this case it could be > the only way to get it to work cleanly. One more question... If you have a choice between patching the port Makefile or adding more to the patches/ directory, which is preferable? -- Zach Heilig -- zach@gaffaneys.com A horse without a nose... never wins. (unknown) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message