From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Aug  1 20:20:57 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCF237B400
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Aug 2002 20:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF9D43E65
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Aug 2002 20:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g723JVtg035399;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 23:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g723JRTe035394;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 23:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL vs. -lmd
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 23:19:26 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <200207311641.g6VGfRWj099655@freefall.freebsd.org> <200208012006.25130@aldan> <3D49E41D.57DBF81C@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D49E41D.57DBF81C@mindspring.com>
X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVihy+z3/UR{6SCQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200208012319.26676@aldan>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:45 pm, Terry Lambert wrote:
= Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= ...not very happening, if I need an app_verify_callback() that
= actually passes the user's void * parameter like it's supposed
= to, AES CFB or OFB or CTR, RFC2256 compliance for object
= definitions, IBM 4758 crypto card support, or want Theo de Raadt's
= security patch for ui_openssl.c, or want X.509 mandatory extension
= handling or CRL checking, or use PKCS#7 with S/MIME, etc..  That
= (and a lot more) all requires that I use 0.9.7.

So, you can either upgrade the port, or install OpenSSL-0.9.7 on your
own, following the generic procedure. Nothing will break...

[...]

= > In any case, same problem (if it is a problem) exists with -lc, -lm
= > (oh, yes!) and other libraries. Why pick on OpenSSL?
=
= Because it was the example in the subject line of a message that
= wanted to get rid of libmd, making my software dependent on the
= libcrypt version number when it wasn't before.

But you are happy to depend on libmd's version number?

= If I picked a different example, it would just be someone else
= unhappy, plus people could complain that it was off topic for
= the subject line.  8-).

In other words, in your view, the system should contain no third-party usable
libraries at all?.. Perhaps. But ours does contain plenty, and OpenSSL is 
hardly the first candidate to be removed.

	-mi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message