Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:48:11 +0100
From:      Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r493354 - in head/sysutils: . py-bitrot
Message-ID:  <20190219124807.GA82443@urd.tobik.me>
In-Reply-To: <20190219115338.GA46857@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201902190818.x1J8I8WT095199@repo.freebsd.org> <20190219082916.GA16223@FreeBSD.org> <45f02a0a-be04-4d62-a4ff-96d800e8687c@www.fastmail.com> <20190219101610.GA71171@FreeBSD.org> <20190219103209.GA45811@urd.tobik.me> <20190219115338.GA46857@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:53:38AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:32:10AM +0100, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:16:10AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 04:11:05AM -0500, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > Sure, can you please contact the maintainer or upstream about it?
> > >=20
> > > In this case (if upstream and maitainer fail to provide sensible port
> > > description), you as the committer should perform a quick review of t=
he
> > > software and come up with our (FreeBSD's) own.  We should not offer a
> > > half-baked stuff to our users.  They should have some idea of what th=
ey
> > > are about to install.
> >=20
> > Nonsense.  That's a good way to burnout completely.  I do not have
> > any stake in this port whatsoever beyond fulfilling a simple request
> > to add it to the tree.  You are asking way too much of me here.
>=20
> With this kind of attitude, don't be surprized when someone decides to
> add an "rm -rf /" port to the tree. :-(

Sigh...  It seems you are accusing me of not reviewing this port
due to the not-good-enough-for-danfe package description which I
think is jumping to conclusions awfully fast.

If I missed something and if you have any evidence that this port
is malicious I'd like to hear about it, so that we can do the
appropriate thing like removing it again.

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=D9vL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190219124807.GA82443>