From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:46:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E5516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:46:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D087643D58 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:46:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF671DD601; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:46:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([193.2.4.66]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52899-19; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:46:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rincewind.ijs.si (rincewind.ijs.si [193.2.4.137]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE39C1DD5F9; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:46:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:46:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 References: <20040726152647.6e84d7e8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040726152647.6e84d7e8@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407262146.32443.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new / Sophos+Sophie at ijs.si cc: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:46:37 -0000 On Monday 26 of July 2004 21:26, epilogue wrote: > > What dependencies do I tell pkgdb -F for the removed bitmap or scalable > > fonts stuff? Is there a "one size fits all" answer? If so, can it be > > noted in /usr/ports/UPDATING? > > +1. > > during the changeover, i wasn't prompted for bitmap, but when asked to > subsitute for scalable, i ended up changing the dependency to > xorg-fonts-truetype-6.7.0. i imagine that i could also have used > xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0. > > would anyone know which is a better match? That would depend on port that depends on either of scalable fonts: The change goes thusly: XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps -> xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps +-> xorg-fonts-truetype XFree86-4-fontScalable -+ +-> xorg-fonts-type1 Most ports that depend on scalable fonts probably want truetype ones. Moreover, when port that depended on XFree86-4-fontScalable is upgraded, it will pick up the dependancy it wants. The easy way is to have both ports installed and let future upgrades register the right dependancy as specified by maintainers. Though if you want to, you can check which one the port expects in it's Makefile. Dejan