From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 11:04:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B77916A41F; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A4043D4C; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:04:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B46A61D1; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CE261CA; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7705533CA7; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:04:03 +0200 (CEST) To: Lyndon Nerenberg References: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk> <20050805214650.H46767@fledge.watson.org> <42F5AA8D.3060201@freebsd.org> <430EBA46.2060307@orthanc.ca> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:04:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <430EBA46.2060307@orthanc.ca> (Lyndon Nerenberg's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:44:22 -0700") Message-ID: <86d5o1q7rw.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: splitting off RPC and friends X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:04:09 -0000 Lyndon Nerenberg writes: > RPC and XDR are far from dead. Are you sure splitting these out is > wise? We have to keep the code around, for NFS if nothing else. What's > the benefit of moving the routines into a separate library? Faster load times for the great majority of libc consumers which do not need XDR, RPC or NIS? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no