Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:47:59 +0000 From: Lexi Winter <lexi@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p9fs (bhyve) success report Message-ID: <20241107204759.A67CAA28@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <B2B6FDFD-A95E-42F9-B5BF-82716B6D20BF@iitbombay.org> References: <20241107203118.B4A5D53C@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> <B2B6FDFD-A95E-42F9-B5BF-82716B6D20BF@iitbombay.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bakul Shah: > On Nov 7, 2024, at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM, Lexi Winter = > <lexi@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> wrote: > > as this has come up before here (and didn't make it into the quarterly = > status > > report), i just wanted to mention that i'm currently using p9fs(5) in = > -current > > to export a filesystem from the host to a bhyve VM and, after some = > fixes made > > in October, it's been rock solid for me. > How is the performance compared to nfs?= i haven't done any specific performance testing. for the workload i'm interested in (which is mostly 50MB/s or less of largely random i/o) i haven't noticed any issues, though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20241107204759.A67CAA28>