From nobody Thu Nov 7 20:47:59 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XkvKX5B13z5cbBv for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lexi@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org) Received: from fuchsia.eden.le-Fay.ORG (fuchsia.eden.le-fay.org [81.187.47.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XkvKX4VXYz41C1 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lexi@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from hemlock.eden.le-fay.org (hemlock.eden.le-fay.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:aab5:4::10]) by fuchsia.eden.le-Fay.ORG (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC68F868E; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hemlock.eden.le-fay.org (Postfix, from userid 10006) id A67CAA28; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:47:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Lexi Winter To: Bakul Shah cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p9fs (bhyve) success report In-reply-to: References: <20241107203118.B4A5D53C@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <77511.1731012479.1@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:47:59 +0000 Message-Id: <20241107204759.A67CAA28@hemlock.eden.le-fay.org> X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XkvKX4VXYz41C1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Bakul Shah: > On Nov 7, 2024, at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM, Lexi Winter = > wrote: > > as this has come up before here (and didn't make it into the quarterly = > status > > report), i just wanted to mention that i'm currently using p9fs(5) in = > -current > > to export a filesystem from the host to a bhyve VM and, after some = > fixes made > > in October, it's been rock solid for me. > How is the performance compared to nfs?= i haven't done any specific performance testing. for the workload i'm interested in (which is mostly 50MB/s or less of largely random i/o) i haven't noticed any issues, though.