From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 10:27:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F243B16A4B3; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE71743FB1; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:27:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [128.131.111.52] (naos [128.131.111.52]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC131378E; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:27:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `lang/gcc33': why without ADA & Java? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:27:14 -0000 > Why our gcc-3.3.1 port doesn't build & install ADA part of > gcc? We don't have separate ports for it, too... Because nobody (including GNAT) really cared very much about the Ada frontend that is part of GCC. Also, GNAT is quite a beast, so it probably should be built and packaged separately from lang/gcc3x in any case. (Note that GCJ _is_ built by default.) Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/