From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 26 00:22:14 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA03796 for current-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 00:22:14 -0800 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA03788 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 00:22:10 -0800 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA16933; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 10:22:00 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.9/8.6.9-s1) with UUCP id KAA15969 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 10:21:59 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA08539 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 10:06:01 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199503260806.KAA08539@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Invalid DOSpartition table may be a bad idea To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 10:05:58 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: from "Frank Durda IV" at Mar 25, 95 04:58:00 pm Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 637 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Frank Durda IV wrote: > > To avoid user problems, we may not want to put drives that our stuff is on > in a state where we will get wiped-out if the user happens to boot a > Windows 95 floppy, which late this year will be (sadly) one of the most ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > common operating systems on the planet. Did they announce the century the `95' belongs to? :-] (It's my understanding of KleinWeich, that `95' will expand to the term `Not before Dec 31, 95', btw.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)