From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 21:06:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038AA16A41F for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leimy2k@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CF043D49 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:06:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leimy2k@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so1202567nzo for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:06:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZpKktE5Bybp9ckYj66HkNQVCRwxBTbuml+P2HtqX2qMe8B4EghZwXEKe+sHERVEvK942wnvjit61AxZW5Cr37zQX6eBPCKjz9BAfFIKMWQaWuj5sJdqiSyIJo9Y5Oh90pqrRtc+55luKqKYrXGnv8g8oQG3yX/vNfJ74oWD8pxQ= Received: by 10.36.121.4 with SMTP id t4mr5143044nzc; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.46.3 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:06:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3e1162e60601161306m7194ba57x478db322be8f99a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:06:55 -0800 From: David Leimbach To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <43CB2A80.7090602@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060111212605.79848.qmail@web34104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <43C5B4B2.9000707@elischer.org> <43C5B6F0.1050004@samsco.org> <43C5BA62.3010301@elischer.org> <43C5BB37.6040202@samsco.org> <9ab217670601111821u27cb9852w@mail.gmail.com> <43C9E5A1.5070203@freebsd.org> <43C9E8ED.4030209@samsco.org> <3e1162e60601150741y7d8f110bla8f52ab32d93e793@mail.gmail.com> <43CB2A80.7090602@samsco.org> Cc: Tim Kientzle , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Intel Macs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:06:57 -0000 On 1/15/06, Scott Long wrote: > David Leimbach wrote: > > > > > > On 1/14/06, *Scott Long* > > > wrote: > > > > Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > > > > > >>> iMac, download the EFI spec from www.intel.com > > , open up the existing > > >> > > >> > > >> For the lazy / impatient / bad searchers: > > >> http://www.intel.com/technology/efi/ > > > > > > > > > On a related note, anyone know about any VMWare or Xen or other > > similar > > > virtual machine environment for Mac/Intel? (FreeBSD on Virtual > > PC on > > > Rosetta sounds very scary... ;-( > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > A meta-question to this is whether it will be possible to compile a= nd > > boot OpenDarwin on these x86 machines, like you can with the PPC on= es. > > If you can then I see no reason why Darwin couldn't be Xen-ified an= d > > serve as a Domain-0 host. > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > I can't think of why opendarwin wouldn't work on a machine apple > > actually supports hardware-wise. Then again I didn't see any new > > releases of software on opendarwin.org relating > > to 10.4.4 yet :). > > > > I know the guy at apple who used to make these releases though and he's > > been working on a cool build system for building the whole system from > > the tarred snapshot releases from time to time. I used to test this > > stuff for him. > > > > It will take interested people with actual time to do the Xen port of > > course. I'm not sure how much work a Xen host port is compared to a Xe= n > > guest though. > > > > Dave > > > > > I guess I should clarify myself a bit. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that > OpenDarwin will boot on the Intel machines eventually, even if the > source isn't available today. What I'm really wondering about is > whether OpenDarwin will be able to support OSX on those machines. > And yeah, Kevin has done a good job with the OpenDarwin build system. > It still has a long ways to go before it's as nice as the FreeBSD one, > but it's better than it used to be =3D-) > > Scott > The bless man page for Mac OS X Intel reveals much about changing the efi boot "thingy". Seems that's where you'd want to put the FreeBSD loader... but that means it'll live on HFS+, and then we might want the FreeBSD loader to be able to boot Mac OS X too. Got some friends who've got their intel macs already... we'll see if they get experimental or not. I'm really not caring for dual boot as much as I am hoping for something like VMWare on Mac OS X so I can host FBSD and others there. I guess that takes EFI out of the equation at that point too. At some point... having to reboot kind of sucks :) Dave