From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 05:52:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0916A475 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7968013C48C for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2007 05:52:40 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 23 Jun 2007 07:52:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BMrVzJ53Bhh2/XG3mueYEqRLRJtvp9vkANJhrwM ueyQbnS3mpb0go Message-ID: <467CB526.7090808@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:52:38 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Blah Blatz References: <248491.30726.qm@web59305.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <248491.30726.qm@web59305.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I guess I misread. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:52:42 -0000 Blah Blatz wrote: > I thought that I followed the directions in UPDATING regarding Xorg 7.2, but, uh, I guess I didn't. My computer now seems beyond repair, with respect to X. I'm strongly considering giving up, wiping the hard drive, reinstalling FreeBSD, and restoring my personal stuff from backups. > > So, my questions: > > If I do that, and install the latest xorg on a completely fresh FreeBSD box: > > Do I have to set XORG_UPGRADE (or whatever it's called)? > > Should I still use portupgrade-devel instead of portupgrade? I would rather just use portupgrade, if I can. > > Do I have to follow any of the other directions in UPDATING regarding this... stuff? > > Or can I just do a normal old "cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg; make install" without any of the special new exciting xorg crap in UPDATING? If you use a minimal install, without any ports, you can just start with creating the link: /usr/X11R6 /usr/local. Then there is not reason to use portupgrade (other than comfort) or follow any of the instructions in UPDATING.