From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 28 02:34:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7B9FD1065672; Fri, 28 May 2010 02:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:34:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "David E. O'Brien" Message-ID: <20100528023442.GA65349@FreeBSD.org> References: <201005272358.o4RNwC0H032046@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005272358.o4RNwC0H032046@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/subversion Makefile.common ports/devel/subversion-freebsd Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:34:42 -0000 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:58:12PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > I have not done this via an OPTION as I do not know if we want to expose > "Build with FreeBSD hacks" to all the users of the Subversion port. Instead > it keys off of 'WITH_FREEBSD_SUBVERSION'. If putting this in OPTIONS is the > better approach I can follow up and do that. I don't think there is anything bad with exposing "Build with FreeBSD hacks" to the wild. ./danfe