Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:12:16 +0000 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zfs Guide Message-ID: <30416b76-574c-4aa1-9896-cb90d7c083f7@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMtcK2q6pbW7FUiO5OWF3Ec6YJ_GiDscNXxkR1CnAu%2BZvYBCdg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20221106143708.a72fd78c67eb4b055b138449@sohara.org> <805FA79F-8AEE-421E-A56C-BE16209B8CAD@gmail.com> <CAMtcK2q6pbW7FUiO5OWF3Ec6YJ_GiDscNXxkR1CnAu%2BZvYBCdg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, 6 Nov 2022, at 21:30, paul beard wrote: > As someone who screwed up their root/sole drive not long ago, this ZFS=20 > discussion is interesting. The rebuilding process might have been=20 > easier or even unnecessary, had I been able to roll back to a snapshot= .=20 > So even after reading all of this, I have to ask if this is the right=20 > call for me. I use Freebsd in a VM, have two disk images already with = a=20 > job to mirror them as a backup (not gmirror, I didn't know about that=20 > when i set this all up). Will zfs allow me to run the services I run=20 > now with the same ease (booting into the VM automagically) with the=20 > added security of snapshots and redundancy? I guess a peruse of the=20 > fine manual is in order=E2=80=A6?=20 You might want to take a look at man 8 bectl if you have a recent=20 (13-stable) system or newer, as well as all the newer zfs stuff --=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30416b76-574c-4aa1-9896-cb90d7c083f7>