From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 14 08:23:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421DE240; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3AE26BA; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-172-17-154-34.eduroam.lapwing.private.cam.ac.uk (global-1-26.nat.csx.cam.ac.uk [131.111.184.26]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7E8NCWR016716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:23:14 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r253802 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Headers From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20130813205736.GA68244@stack.nl> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:23:11 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2A4F32C7-939D-4C4D-A136-D99FC06C486E@FreeBSD.org> References: <201307301233.r6UCXLT8012177@svn.freebsd.org> <2DE35C45-B110-4D93-BFA7-542A3D1EE902@freebsd.org> <20130807205653.GB4918@stack.nl> <46BC9A7E-4AF1-4BE9-9902-3578BDE0CD56@FreeBSD.org> <20130813205736.GA68244@stack.nl> To: Jilles Tjoelker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org" , Matthew Fleming , "svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org" , "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" , Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:23:16 -0000 On 13 Aug 2013, at 21:57, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > Given that JIT is for performance and larger addresses increase code > size and register pressure, the mmap() flag is probably useful. > Alternatively, all the JITted code could be placed in one block and = use > relative addressing. This would be a good thing to have in for 10.0, as the LLVM 3.4 JIT will = require it unless someone wants to contribute support for the large code = model... David