From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jan 20 15:59:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64638A8A118 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teleric-lists@outlook.com) Received: from BAY004-OMC3S15.hotmail.com (bay004-omc3s15.hotmail.com [65.54.190.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E381975 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teleric-lists@outlook.com) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.189]) by BAY004-OMC3S15.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:58:22 -0800 Received: from SN1PR18MB0509.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.16) by SN1PR18MB0510.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.365.19; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:58:18 +0000 Received: from SN1PR18MB0509.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.16]) by SN1PR18MB0509.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.16]) with mapi id 15.01.0365.024; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:58:18 +0000 From: Teleric Team To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? Thread-Topic: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? Thread-Index: AQHRU5sp44Z5iOLtx06HbGf33LZONQ== Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:58:18 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [t3W1ltnmJU+wnZlAyhJua028gnxVkZ++] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR18MB0510; 23:yh2kaIlbikij5xfWSYNG8L5EdXT2pUNNnYeOMvgDuSnyCN/jq0ISJNub+9IK1Udx9U0sJrGsSUUhK4InkPxTZlj+krIl4RVBL1b5M8yrlzGb3Y/g9x2XoNwsQJEusF/1wM+f9hLYyAOoVxXCKgQz+lT7bU8eadCeC0+Kyo/PfFe05DMXN4EUPbAQS8rX+tItg9Se+1nkMH7kOmaGd9LzrA==; 5:MgMfz9UQR6VNqW8gegYDjUFXxY/dqiVI+vCsWA+KAC3vHOCu6otrzi+VxpBWfK0llwwYGKxNuDYuQcvwd4MYwFvUr+yeKb/kH4B/1zfHQXNPTJCiC6GKrPvovcrnETQFbSTDK1GecZYprt4hy+RC0Q==; 24:LnIwxJIjWwT7XRdEdhxuisEcipS6T5iZ11in+sh/Ve//lkSIbLjF8ggS7a6P/GqQ8kl9X1WUKuZ7cAePioXhyAfzZutJ101awP1BblEa/Qs= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR18MB0510; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 65ac0192-8492-4356-9b20-08d321b283b1 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:SN1PR18MB0510; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR18MB0510; x-forefront-prvs: 0827D7ACB9 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070004)(98900002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR18MB0510; H:SN1PR18MB0509.namprd18.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jan 2016 15:58:18.5784 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR18MB0510 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2016 15:58:22.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[635387F0:01D1539B] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:59:28 -0000 I got a Chelsio T5 520-SO with two ports and I get 2 interfaces for it port= , cxl and ncxl (cxl0 ncxl0 cxl1 ncxl1). Man page mentions cxl is for T5, wh= at about ncxl? Should I get both or is something wrong? Which one should I = use? (is there any difference?). Thank you.