From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 16 20:29:02 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C551065675
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993508FC1A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:29:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:Content-Type;
	bh=1+xVIfHhAyzEHBKQVLRsCPcZQQGXNt9zmsfe5zO9+EY=; 
	b=sQL06rdPmRo0XCJgottkVdkXTutn/0iACa1VnRGELJHsS3iVOKZaMzrF18PDSlFw1CR2Sn58dOhK913uWbgOc8/V/uBVvnuvot3xeW07CEjFaZ1yi8s46eMKJV9zFJgX;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
	id 1SfzcB-00040y-22; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:28:59 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1339878538-26372-26371/5/85; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:28:58
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:29:18 -0500
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Win32)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:29:02 -0000

On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:17:19 -0500, Wojciech Puchar  
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> and - at least for now - clang itself is very slow. But produces not  
> worse (or better) code than gcc.

Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean  
and modular -- not bloated.