Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:44:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198571] net-mgmt/lldpd: runtime issues when using lldpd_flags Message-ID: <bug-198571-13-idl9uBMC8t@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-198571-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-198571-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198571 mathieu.sim@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathieu.sim@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from mathieu.sim@gmail.com --- Hi Jason First, thanks for your feedback, good to see somebody eventually makes use of this port - and finds bugs... I remember that I added command_args=${lldpd_flags} expectring I "somehow" explicitely needed passing the arguments given in lldpd_flags to make use of it. - After reading rc.subr(8) I agree with you that this is bogus, I'll ask a commiter to apply your patch. In the meantime: I don't have LLDP or CDP-capable network equipment within reach while writing this message so I tried to see what happens with a FreeBSD VM with 2 nics using the -I switch. I tried also on the CLI simply: "lldpd -d -I em0" and expected lldpd to only send over em0 not em1. Then tcpdump told me that lldp packages was sending over both em0 and em1. Neither did I see something that remotely looked like a CDP packet when launching lldpd with -c switch. It would be nice if you could you confirm this behaviour, if this is a (FreeBSD) issue and not myself looking at it the wrong way I'll point upstream a this. Thanks again, Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198571-13-idl9uBMC8t>