Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 07:45:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255678] security/strongswan cant add routes via RTM_ADD via PF_ROUTE socket Message-ID: <bug-255678-7501-R5Z0DQsAzK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-255678-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-255678-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255678 --- Comment #19 from Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org> --- > *BSD has RTAX_IFA rtsock option allowing to choose the preferred source a= ddress. Great. Weirdly, we already parse this when we check the routes to determine= a source address, not sure exactly why we never added it to the routes. Does that also work if the address in RTAX_IFA is on a different interface = than the one configured with RTAX_IFP? (In Martin's case the address is on igb0 while the interface is igb1.) > FreeBSD has support for multiple routing tables (net.fibs), though there = may be some rough edges. Are these managed via PF_ROUTE interface? Or how does that work/interoperate exactly? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255678-7501-R5Z0DQsAzK>