From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 08:56:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F02616A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (207-173-254-228.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [207.173.254.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B21644008 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:56:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from l035522 (unknown [165.107.42.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AA43BF39E; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:56:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <01bd01c3a93d$db4ef570$6e2a6ba5@lc.ca.gov> From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "Jan Grant" , "William O'Higgins" References: <20031111173315.GA30896@sillyrabbi.dyndns.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:55:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -arR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:56:07 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Grant" Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:37 AM > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, William O'Higgins wrote: > > > Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through: > > > > portupgrade -arR > > > > It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm wondering how much > > longer it is likely to take? I realize that "that depends" > > Well, "that depends"; many ports can be upgraded quickly. However > compilation of C++ is markedly slower than compilation of C, so whenever > you see things like KDE or Qt meeding an upgrade, expect it to take a > while. > > If you use "portversion -v | grep -v =" then you'll see the list of > ports which remain that need updating. (You need to run portsdb after a > cvsup for the output of this, and portupgrade's operation, to be > accurate.) Or you can use the (IMHO) simpler 'portversion -vL=' to get the same information. Cheers, Drew