From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 15 23:23:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D89DDB; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dawidek.net (garage.dawidek.net [91.121.88.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC691A67; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (89-73-195-149.dynamic.chello.pl [89.73.195.149]) by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 696304FC; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:16:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:23:41 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Tim Kientzle Subject: Re: dhclient can't limit bpf descriptor? Message-ID: <20131215232341.GA1343@garage.freebsd.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: FreeBSD current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:23:05 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:12:23PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Opened up an old VM from a month or so ago (r257910) and dhclient won=E2= =80=99t start. >=20 > Specifically, dhclient complains (when run by root): > =E2=80=9Ccan=E2=80=99t limit bpf descriptor: Bad address=E2=80=9D > and then immediately exits. >=20 > What does this mean? I don=E2=80=99t know anything about the capabiliti= es > framework and certainly haven=E2=80=99t configured it in any way. Maybe your userland and kernel are out of sync? There was backward-incompatible change in Capsicum that could result in error like that (capability rights are now passed as a pointer to a structure and not uint64_t bitfield). --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://mobter.com --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlKuOf0ACgkQForvXbEpPzTnfgCgx/Ssrs88reKmI4GqK9BkiPQp hcMAni9qUF0VXVwtibHMWdqY46MTDgti =dy9k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--