From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jul 23 11:32:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA05347 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:32:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from stage1.thirdage.com (stage1.ThirdAge.com [204.74.82.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA05315 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jal@ThirdAge.com) Received: from gigi (budd.ThirdAge.com [204.74.82.199]) by stage1.thirdage.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA18544 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980723112905.017af650@204.74.82.151> X-Sender: jal@204.74.82.151 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:29:05 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jamie Lawrence Subject: Re: Apples and oranges? FreeBSD and MacOSX Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Um, forgive me if I'm clue-deprived here, but I thought MacOS X >was a strategy for backing away from Rhapsody for desktop machines. >From my reading, it was to be a revved up MacOS on which developers >could count on a subset of the former APIs being executed in a >preemptive multitasking, memory protected environment. Basically, >most of what Copeland was to have been. I didn't think there was >any Unix involved, although it would make sense to use what they >have. Does anyone know for sure that I'm wrong? Someone just made clear to me that I am, indeed, clue deprived on this one. I would encourage the world to ignore me on this one. -j To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message