From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  4 01:40:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0841016A4CE; Fri,  4 Jun 2004 01:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7256043D3F; Fri,  4 Jun 2004 01:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net)
Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=ganbold.micom.mng.net)
	by publicd.ub.mng.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD)
	id 1BWAFg-000F1r-Ey; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:40:37 +0800
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20040604173402.02db3468@202.179.0.80>
X-Sender: ganbold@micom.mng.net@202.179.0.80
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:41:06 +0900
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: IBM e325 ServeRAID-6M on FreeBSD 5.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:40:32 -0000

Hi,

We are planning to purchase IBM e325 server with ServeRAID-6M and Dual AMD 
Opteron 2.2Ghz CPU.
Did somebody make FreeBSD 5.x work on IBM e325 server with ServeRAID-6M before?
Are there any known problems and issues?
Will FreeBSD 5.x work on it?

thanks in advance,

Ganbold