Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:32:22 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: jeh@FreeBSD.org Cc: joseph@randomnetworks.com, lioux@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/frontpage-es Makefiledistinfo pkg-comment Message-ID: <200112281832.fBSIWPf33276@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <3C2CB635.17B88555@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Dec, James E. Housley wrote: >> # > Added files: >> # > www/frontpage-es Makefile distinfo pkg-comment >> # > Log: >> # > o New port frontpage-es version 5.0.2.2623: Microsoft Frontpage >> # > Spanish Web Administration >> # > o Slave port of Microsoft Frontpage Arabic Web Administration port [...] >> # This sequence of frontpage-<language> ports is pretty scary... >> # Can't we have it all under one port with a dialog based configure >> # to ask which language should be used? Defaulting to $LANG, for >> # example... >> I'd like to second this idea. In addition a quick glance at >> the porter's handbook doesn't mention this situation, perhaps it >> should. > Except with a "language dialog" there wont be packages built for each > language. IMO, that, really, is a problem with our official package building setup (bento). It hardly justifies having 15 new ports ON EVERY FreeBSD INSTALLATION, that installs ports collection. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112281832.fBSIWPf33276>