Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Jul 1995 17:29:34 +0300
From:      Kai Vorma <vode@snakemail.hut.fi>
To:        John Utz <spaz@u.washington.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD hackerlist <FreeBSD-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>
Subject:   Re: dlmalloc
Message-ID:  <199507041429.RAA19837@vinkku.hut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91j.950704051121.9067B-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>
References:  <Pine.OSF.3.91j.950704051121.9067B-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Utz writes:
 > I recall reading a report on this list of someone using dlmalloc ( doug 
 > lea malloc? ) with good success.

I have been using it about 2-3 months (I replaced libc/stdlib/malloc.c
with Doug Lea's malloc-2.5.3b.c and then did make world). So far only
two system programs has failed and both have been fixed some time ago.

I also use it with XFree86-3.1.1 (X-server and binaries) with very
good success. Performance is far better than with system malloc
altough GNU-malloc is sometimes better still.

Perhaps someone would commit it to 2.2 developement branch so that
more people would test it.. 

..vode


PS. There is a note in the comments that it is preliminary version and
    unreleased. I asked the author and he said that it is very stable
    and he has just forgotten to lift the comment and increment the
    version number.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507041429.RAA19837>