Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 10:50:56 +0200 (MET DST) From: Thomas Gellekum <thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, nwestfal@indigo.csci.csusb.edu, ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: /usr/ports/distfiles - did I screw the pooch here? Message-ID: <199504240850.KAA22748@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <199504220614.XAA03827@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at Apr 21, 95 11:14:55 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > > Why don't we change it to a symbolic link? Then "get ports.tar.gz" > will only pick it up as a symlink.... Last time I fetched a directory containing a symlink with get <dir>.tar.gz, the ftp at the other site followed the link... tg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504240850.KAA22748>