From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:20:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713F31065678; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8827A8FC19; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA08928; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:20:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5BAE50.5030407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:20:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:51 -0000 on 29/08/2011 18:18 Ivan Voras said the following: > On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >>> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>>> right? >>>> >>>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >>> >>> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >>> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >>> >>> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >>> before displaying the copyright banner). >> >> Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. >> Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. > > If it did, to what should I set it? See one line above your question :-) >> You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. > > I'll take some photos of the screen. No serial console? :( -- Andriy Gapon