Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:17:42 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile Message-ID: <199509292017.NAA25022@aslan.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Sep 1995 22:11:47 %2B0200." <199509292011.WAA22433@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> <<On Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:38:22 -0700, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.Free >B >SD.org> said: >> >> > On a similar subject, shouldn't "MAKE_EBONES" go away? Shouldn't the >> > build be based solely on the existance of the directory? >> >> No, certainly not! How would you make no-crypto distributions, then? >> Or are you simply suggesting that everything should be controlled by a >> single option? > >Right now we have two wrongs making a right. We _have_ to have a make >with no MAKE_EBONES to make the clean distribution, followed by a nasty >hack to make the tainted distribution. Why can we not have "make >distribution" do it properly the first time? Sure we will need to fix >the make files, but that can of worms has been brewing for a while... > >M Actually, you have to have "MAKE_EBONES" in you're make.conf in order to do a full make release which makes both the secure and non-secure distributions. Its all screwed up if you ask me. >-- >Mark Murray >46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa >+27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 >Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== Software Developer - Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509292017.NAA25022>