From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon May 24  5: 9: 1 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB9A14E89
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 May 1999 05:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au)
Received: (from avalon@localhost)
	by cheops.anu.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA04399
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 May 1999 22:08:48 +1000 (EST)
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199905241208.WAA04399@cheops.anu.edu.au>
Subject: 3c589d and FreeBSD 3.1
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 22:08:47 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Back when I was running 2.2.8 (and on a different laptop), I used zp0
with the 3c589D although it sucked with people recommending using ed0.

Does that recommendation hold true for 3.1 ?  FWIW, I've tried to boot
a kernel with both ed0 & zp0 edit'd with "boot -c" but neither seem to
be able to probe the card at the same `address' that Windows98 sees it
at (IO 0x1020, IRQ 11).  Any hints/tips on how to make it work ?

Darren

p.s. whoever broke "boot -c" options saving should be shot!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message