From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Oct 12 6:31: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B54537B66E for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 13jiRp-0000zA-01; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:31:01 +0200 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9CD8HB92788 for freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:08:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: Problem with FreeBSD on AlphaStation 255/233 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <8s4d41$2ptq$2@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <200010120144.SAA12166@usr09.primenet.com> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Jacob wrote: > The other issue here is that 'dangerously dedicated' for Alpha and > 'dangerously dedicated' for i386 are not interoperable for FreeBSD- despite > the fact that the disklabel program says the types and sizes of partititions > are identical. Are you saying the disklabel program on i386 can actually read the disklabel on an alpha disk or vice versa? I'm under the impression (from ) that the disklabels are simply in different places for the two architectures. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message