From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 28 07:37:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA03747 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sun-test.hightek.com ([194.74.141.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA03680 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 07:36:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm2.hightek.com) Received: from klemm2.hightek.com ([195.90.203.76]) by sun-test.hightek.com (Netscape Mail Server v1.1) with ESMTP id AAA15549; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:36:50 +0200 Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm2.hightek.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA27759; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:36:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980428163645.12712@hightek.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:36:45 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Todd Backman , Ben Cohen Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is Win NT slower than others? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Todd Backman on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 04:37:10PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 04:37:10PM -0500, Todd Backman wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Ben Cohen wrote: > > > Why is Windows NT Server slower than other servers such as FreeBSD? > > > > Is it because of inefficient programming by Microsoft? > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Bingo! ^^^^^ Where do you know that ? Maybe it's just the C compiler ? Remember good old Xenix and SCO Unix times, do you remember the Microsoft C compiler reporting: "internal compiler spill, expression to complicated, please simplify !" -- B&K Gruppe - Wuppertal phone +49 202 7399 - 170 fax +49 202 7399 - 100 http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message