From owner-freebsd-emulation  Thu May  2 13:53:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA24801
          for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 2 May 1996 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA24794
          for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 May 1996 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA02663; Thu, 2 May 1996 13:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: Pace Willisson <pace@blitz.com>
cc: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu>, emulation@freebsd.org,
        mycroft@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: New DOS emulator snapshot (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 15:21:55 EDT."
             <199605021921.PAA16971@mytus.blitz.com> 
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 13:52:27 -0700
Message-ID: <2661.831070347@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I tried to compile doscmd-19960502 on bsdi 2.0.1, and I got a lot of
> errors.  Do you plan to stay compatible with bsdi 2.0.1? 2.1?  It
> appears I at least need an update to gcc to handle 

Our agreement with BSDI was that we'd give them back improvements, so
it would definitely be a good thing to stay compatible with both
systems!  That's why I brought a BSD/OS machine up here for those
wishing to test it.

					Jordan