From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  9 23:46:07 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06A1900;
 Tue,  9 Oct 2012 23:46:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@tormail.org)
Received: from outgoing.tormail.org (outgoing.tormail.org [82.221.96.22])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4893E8FC0C;
 Tue,  9 Oct 2012 23:46:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=internal.tormail.org)
 by outgoing.tormail.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
 (envelope-from <jbeich@tormail.org>)
 id 1TLif8-0004oK-H9; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:52:31 +0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tormail.org;
 s=tm; 
 h=Message-Id:X-TorMail-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From;
 bh=Zb9KeyGGTKSkajmx0dvJz9pMPFIht+NGjotL97xmOOg=; 
 b=Sc8ac/g5DgnQMLQmBxDHxk4NRl98eWqT8giNd/houjnqYUK5f+H1ylYUDw3sUc3krSZIJXfM3P3x1PhHzO5woWfFTAgDXDDwo8OdDwB9pIFVsx3s2K2OZn9LMYUYrBwZ7LYXO2qkkJRFefjj+HwPnSvE+FTFrePjQMs8gE3TvYM=;
Received: from jbeich by internal.tormail.org with local (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <jbeich@tormail.org>)
 id 1TLidW-000EbL-Lp; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:50:51 +0000
From: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk
In-Reply-To: <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> (Baptiste
 Daroussin's message of "Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:10:09 +0200")
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:51:07 -1000
References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-TorMail-User: jbeich
Message-Id: <1TLidW-000EbL-Lp@internal.tormail.org>
Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
 svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:46:07 -0000

Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive options.  I
>> > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for proper
>> > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored.
>> > > 
>> > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project.
>> > 
>> > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist that is
>> > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to implement,
>> > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of
>> > freebsd has it.
>> 
>> Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now).  Is it known what's
>> preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we have
>> working dialog(1) already?
>> 
>> ./danfe
>
> new dialog is only on 9.x and 10.x, if will require to code some special
> dialog(1) dedicated for ports, MFCing libdialog to 8 and 7 is complicated
> because the API isn't compatible.

Why not add devel/cdialog to bootstrap on < 9.0 and install it only when
BATCH is not set?

>
> regards,
> Bapt