Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:49:20 -0500 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VLANs is this right? Message-ID: <5AD978F8-557E-4D51-9B85-BC56AA061D70@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0kbRIA5ZaCYCLaijIvTmGyugiy36vHgU10sAX@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilW7eTmmdUtRlXpRX3CT_vuOkE2M0eDB_qiiauW@mail.gmail.com> <20100705165746.GB10990@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <AANLkTim0kbRIA5ZaCYCLaijIvTmGyugiy36vHgU10sAX@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 5, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Modulok wrote: > It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or > may not be what I actually need! ) >=20 > Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted > devices into. Seconding Peter's request that you not top-post. We read and write this = language left to right, top to bottom, and nothing about email changes = that. You say "un-trusted devices" but would have to trust the device to = configure a VLAN interface. Or back to the ProCurve, it would need to be = configured to tunnel everything on a the untrusted port into a VLAN. = And/Or configure so that the untrusted port is switched only to the = FreeBSD router port. Would be easiest to slip another NIC in the FreeBSD router for this = purpose. Then no VLAN, everything is handled in your firewall. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5AD978F8-557E-4D51-9B85-BC56AA061D70>