From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 00:18:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBDB16A4CE; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:18:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D0143D6A; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:17:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j210HvpG053872; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:17:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Alfred Perlstein From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:39:39 PST." <20050228233939.GB81082@elvis.mu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:17:57 +0100 Message-ID: <53871.1109636277@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_denode.c src/sys/fs/nullfs null_vnops.c src/sys/fs/smbfs smbfs_node.c src/sys/gnu/ext2fs ext2_inode.c src/sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_node.c src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c src/sys/sys vnode.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:18:00 -0000 In message <20050228233939.GB81082@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >* John Baldwin [050228 12:40] wrote: >> On Monday 28 February 2005 06:20 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > phk 2005-02-28 11:20:44 UTC >> > >> > FreeBSD src repository >> > >> > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5) >> > sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c >> > sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_denode.c >> > sys/fs/nullfs null_vnops.c >> > sys/fs/smbfs smbfs_node.c >> > sys/gnu/ext2fs ext2_inode.c >> > sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_node.c >> > sys/kern vfs_subr.c >> > sys/sys vnode.h >> > sys/ufs/ufs ufs_inode.c >> > Log: >> > MFC: >> > remove unused middle argument from vrecycle() >> >> Doesn't this break the ABI for filesystem modules? The ABI is already broken for filesystem modules as far as I know, but if I'm wrong we can revert it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.