Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:48:26 -0600
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
To:        Pawel Pekala <pawel@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pkg-plist for security/super
Message-ID:  <51168BEA.4000605@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20130209181647.25091823@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <51167C58.4060506@missouri.edu> <CADLo83_Bf8qFqw4f5O26%2B95eQDvYRa=yk17fcw9n2P57pJpxmw@mail.gmail.com> <20130209181647.25091823@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/09/2013 11:16 AM, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> Dnia 2013-02-09, o godz. 16:56:03
> Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> napisał(a):
> 
>> On 9 February 2013 16:42, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
>> <stephen@missouri.edu> wrote:
>>> The first line of security/super/pkg-plist is:
>>> # $FreeBSD: head/security/super/pkg-plist 307297 2012-11-10 17:38:33Z
>>> pawel $
>>>
>>> This has the unfortunate effect that the package install process
>>> thinks that there is a file by this name.  So for example, make
>>> deinstall produces:
>>>
>>> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/# $FreeBSD:
>>> head/security/super/pkg-plist 307297 2012-11-10 17:38:33Z pawel $'
>>> doesn't exist
>>>
>>> and there is a similar error for make package.
>>>
>>> (I have seen a lot of email correspondence about pkgng, which I must
>>> admit I have not followed at all.  Is this related in some way?)
>>
>> It is incorrect.  If a $FreeBSD$ is included at all in a pkg-plist it
>> must be preceded by @comment.
>>
>> Pawel, please fix!
> 
> Should be fixed now.
> 

Why do we want this line in pkg-plist at all?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51168BEA.4000605>