From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 11 10:47:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915FE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:47:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA78843D31
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:47:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68])
	by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1BAl0dB014263
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:47:01 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1BAkxXm031412
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:47:00 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1BAksFJ031411;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:54 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to
	glebius@freebsd.org using -f
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:54 +0300
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
To: Guy Helmer <ghelmer@palisadesys.com>
Message-ID: <20050211104654.GC31252@cell.sick.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>,
	Guy Helmer <ghelmer@palisadesys.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <4203AAE3.4090906@palisadesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4203AAE3.4090906@palisadesys.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff
	on relay.bestcom.ru
X-Virus-Status: Clean
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Netgraph performance question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:47:03 -0000

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:31AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
G> I'm wondering if bumping the recvspace should help, if changing the 
G> ngsocket hook to queue incoming data should help, if it would be best to 
G> replace ngsocket with a memory-mapped interface, or if anyone has any 
G> other ideas that would help performance.

You can try to use ng_device as gate between netgraph and userland. May be,
it would be better than ng_socket. But it may be not.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE